- #White noise truerta generator#
- #White noise truerta drivers#
- #White noise truerta full#
- #White noise truerta portable#
The PEQ would also be a lot more useful for this purpose if it were available as Global. And if you need more than that, the EQ requirement is too ambitious, and the monitor is too colored. I was sorta kidding, though, as you have a basic PEQ in the Axe, which can be used providing you don't need more than 5 filters. The Rane is a good tool, I've used it many times, and I'd take the Rane over certain similar devices that cost much more. It looks like you could really fine tune your EQ curve. The Rane RPM-2 looks pretty interesting, Brian G.
#White noise truerta generator#
A white noise generator and a spectrum analyzer would sure be handy to have. Part of the problem is that octave equalization is too course, and I've considered trying an outboard 1/3 octave equalizer. I did get into the ballpark with a Yorkville E10P recently, but it was not close enough. I've tried to match a few different FRFR monitors to my studio monitors by ear, using the Output 2 octave equalizer in the AxeFX.
#White noise truerta full#
And it isn't full range or flat but it is good enough for rock and roll! I'm sure Tom could build a product that fills most of the requirements of this thread but how many do you think would sell? Not many I suspect.Ĭlick to expand.That's the approach I was wondering about last night. I'm presently happy with the sound of the Atomic but it is larger and heavier than I want. If someone finds one, please let me know. And don't forget, it has to be a high quality product with great support. We all want a smallish enclosure that is self powered, weighs around 30 lbs, is able to keep up with loud rock bands and is well built with great sound. Most high end audio systems are large and don't blend well with interior decorator's schemes so loudspeaker manufacturers try to make their enclosures look like furniture hoping it will have a higher WAF. And one person's gem may be your junk! In the audio world, they have a term called WAF.
![white noise truerta white noise truerta](https://www.noiseandhealth.org/articles/2017/19/86/images/NoiseHealth_2017_19_86_24_199239_f2.jpg)
With enough money, you could have most of what you want but there will always be a compromise.
#White noise truerta drivers#
You want it loud, this may be the toughest of all because loud means moving alot of air, that means large drivers etc. You want small but big sound comes from relatively big enclosures (despite what Bose wants you to believe). You want it light, but power and good drivers with solid, good sounding enclosures are heavy. What most of you are looking for is almost impossible. And no amount of fancy eq'ing with electronics will make up for inferior sound.
![white noise truerta white noise truerta](https://cdn.xingosoftware.com/audioxpress/images/fetch/dpr_1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.audioxpress.com%2Fassets%2Fupload%2Fimages%2F0%2F20150508103108_RandomNoiseFrontWeb.jpg)
The interesting thing about personal monitors is that there is no perfect solution, no matter how much you spend. I may well be looking for a product that is not at all covered by that person's company, so I don't see a conflict. Regarding constraints on making recommendations due to where someone works or what they do for a living - I think it should be a case-by-case basis. Accurate is something I am not willing to let go, but realize the low end could be sacrificed due to weight and size considerations. I would be willing to drop "loud" a bit for better portability.
#White noise truerta portable#
It does say "High-End" in the title! Accurate, loud, and portable are what I am looking for. I never mentioned "cheap" as a requirement in this thread.
![white noise truerta white noise truerta](https://orfeosound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/dd1001.jpg)
I would like to right size my SPL requirements so I can improve the other qualities (more accurate or smaller). Does a FRFR monitor rated at 112dB continuous (118dB peak) give me enough headroom? Do I need 118dB, 122dB or 128dB of continuous power, or can this spec even be used for this purpose? What about using peak power as a yardstick (which seems to be more often spec'd). My sense is that "really loud" can cause a compromise with "accurate", as drivers that are constructed to withstand high SPL may trade some accuracy to do this (just "my sense"). Click to expand.I'm willing to take "cheap" off the table and focus on accurate, portable and loud (in that order of priority).